Children inherit height strongly from their parents, and the mid parental formula has estimated adult stature for over a century. Add the parents’ heights, add thirteen centimeters for a boy or subtract for a girl, then halve. The result carries a natural spread of about eight and a half centimeters either way, which is why pediatricians read it as a range, not a promise.
Your visual report appears here
Fill in the form and press Calculate. You will get your number, an interpretation chip, and a personalized chart pack drawn instantly in your browser.
- Risk spectrum with your position marked
- Reference ranges from the original publication
- Shareable link, nothing stored
Scientific references
Height is among the most heritable human traits, with genetics explaining roughly eighty percent of the variation in well fed populations. That strong inheritance makes a child’s final stature partially predictable long before growth plates close, using nothing more than the two numbers every family knows.
The Formula and Its Logic
Averaging the parents gives the mid parental height. Boys finish about thirteen centimeters taller than girls on average at the same genetic background, so the formula adds that difference for sons and subtracts it for daughters. A father at one eighty and a mother at one sixty five predict a son near one seventy nine and a daughter near one sixty six.
The Honest Spread
Nature shuffles the deck with every child. The formula’s standard error runs about eight and a half centimeters, meaning two thirds of children land within that distance of the prediction and the rest scatter wider. Siblings with identical parents routinely differ by ten centimeters. Nutrition, illness, hormones and sleep nudge the outcome within the genetic window, and secular trends have added centimeters generation by generation in many countries.
How Pediatricians Actually Use It
The prediction serves as a yardstick on the growth chart. A child tracking far below the family target range prompts a look at thyroid, growth hormone and chronic disease, while a child growing along their genetic curve, even if short by population standards, usually needs only watching. Bone age X rays refine predictions when the question becomes medically urgent.
The formula assumes European style population averages and works less precisely across populations with different mean heights or where one parent’s growth was stunted by childhood malnutrition.